Factors Affecting the Adoption of Agricultural By-Products as Feed by Beef Cattle Farmers in Maros Regency of South Sulawesi, Indonesia
The utilization of crop residue as a feed is very important because the arable land area is relatively limited. The study was aimed to examine the influence of adoption of crop-residue product as a feed. The research was conducted in Maros District by using survey methods from March to August 2015. The number of respondents was 96 farmers scattered throughout the Districts of Bantimurung and Camba as centers of rice, corn plant, and cattle productions. Questionnaires were used to collect data conducted by a trained enumerator. Survey was arranged using a logistic regression model to identify socio economic factors influencing the adoption of crop residue as a feed. Work perception (X2), contact with extension workers (X4), rice cultivated areas (X5), the number of livestock (X6), subjective norm (X7), and difficulty (X8) were socio-economic variables influencing the adoption of crop residue as a feed. However, the variables age (X1), farmer experiences (X3), and the number of family members (X9) had no effect on the adoption of this technology. In conclusion, extension workers play an important role in increasing the adoption of technology by using rice and corn straws as a feed. Likewise, not only the number of livestocks, but also the good perception of the farmers increased along with the increase of feed availability, such as utilization of rice and corn straws.
Baba, S., S.N. Sirajuddin, A. Abdullah, & M. Aminawar. 2014. Barrier to adoption of integration of maize-livestock in Maros, Gowa and Takalar Regency. JITP Vol. 3 No. 2: 114-120.
Bodorkos, B. & G. Pataki. 2009. Linking academic and local knowledge: community-based research and service learning for sustainable rural development in Hungaria. J. Clean. Product. 17:1123-1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.023
Bremer, L.L., K.A. Farley, & Lopezz-Carr David. 2014. What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador’s Socio Paramo program. Land Use Pol. 36:122-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.002
Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan. 2015. Data Populasi Ternak di Indonesia. Dirjen Peternakan, Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
Feola G. & C.R. Binder. 2010. Towards and improved understanding of farmer’s behavior: The integrative agent-centered (IAC) framework. Ecol. Econ. 69:2323-2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.023
Giller, K.E., E. Witter, M. Corbeelsand, & P. Tittonell. 2009. Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa:the heretics’view. Field Crops Res. 114:23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017
Hauser, M., M. Lintdner, S. Prehsler, & L. Probst. 2016. Farmer participatory research: why extension workers should understand and facilitate farmer’s role transitions. J. Rural Stud. 47:52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.007
Haryanto, B. 2009. Inovasi teknologi pakan ternak dalam sistem integrasi Tanaman-Ternak bebas limbah mendukung upaya peningkatan produksi daging. Pengembangan Inovasi Pertanian 2:163-176.
He, J., Z. Zhou, H. Weyerhaeuser, & J. Xu. 2009. Participatory technology development for incorporating non-timber forest products into forest restoration in Yunnan, Southwest China. For. Ecol. Manage. 257:2010-2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.041
Mudzengi, C.P., L.M. Taderera, A. Tigere, C.S. Kapembeza, S. Moyana, M. Zimondi, E.T. Derembwe, & E. Dahwa. 2014. Adoption of urea treatment of maize stover technology for dry season supplementation of cattle in Wedza, Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 26, Article #160. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/9/mudz26160.htm
National Statistical Bureau – BPS. 2014. Statistik Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2014/05/05/8d2c08d9d41aa8c02fad22e7/statistik-indonesia-2014.html
National Statistical Bureau – BPS. 2015. Statistik Padi Kabupaten Maros Tahun 2014. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Maros, Maros.
Supaporn, P., T. Kobayashi, & C. Supawadee. 2013. Factors affecting farmer’s decisions on utilization of rice straw compost in Northeastern Thailand. J. Agr. Rural Develop. Trop. Subtrop. 114-1:21-27.
Parmawati, R., Mashudi, A. Budiarto, Suyadi, & A.S. Kurnianto. 2018. Developing sustainable livestock production by feed adequacy map: A case study in Pasuruan Indonesia. Trop. Anim. Sci. J. 41:67-76. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2018.41.1.67
Ralevic P., S. G. Patiland, & G. van Loon. 2010. Integrated agriculture production systems for meeting household food, fooder and fuel security. J. Sust. Agric. 34: 878-906. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2010.519203
Reimer, A.P., D.K. Weinkauf, & L.S. Prokopy. 2012. The Influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agriculture best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds. J. Rural Stud. 28:118-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.005
Rhoades, R.E. & R.H. Boath. 1982. Farmer-back-to-farmer: a model for generating acceptable agriculture technology. Agr. Admin. 11:127-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-586X(82)90056-5
Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth Ed., New York Press, New York.
Valbuena D, O. Erensteinb, S. Homann-Kee Tuic, T. Abdoulayed, L. Claessense, A.J. Duncang, B. Gérarda, M.C. Rufinoh, N. Teufeli, A. van Rooyencand, & M.T. van Wijkh. 2012. Conservation agriculture in Mixed crop-livestock systems: Scoping crop residue trade-offs in sub-saharan Africa and South Asia. Field Crops Res. 132:175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.022
Winarsoh, B. & E. Basuno. 2013. Pengembangan pola integrasi Tanaman-Ternak merupakan bagian upaya mendukung usaha pembibitan sapi potong dalam negeri. For. Penelitian Agroekonomi 31:151-169. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v31n2.2013.151-169
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors submitting manuscripts should understand and agree that copyright of manuscripts of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Tropical Animal Science Journal. The statement to release the copyright to Tropical Animal Science Journal is stated in Form A. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) where Authors and Readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.