Spatial Modeling for Determining Managerial Options for Structuring Productivity in KPH Bogor

  • Ricca Rohani Hutauruk
  • Nining Puspaningsih
  • Muhammad Buce Saleh
Keywords: forest management unit, multi-criteria analysis, geographic information system, Perhutani


KPH Bogor

Ricca Rohani Hutauruk1, 2*, Nining Puspaningsih3, Muhammad Buce Saleh3

1Graduate School of  Bogor Agricultural University, Dramaga Main Road, Campus IPB Dramaga, Bogor,
Indonesia 16680
2Trainer, Environment and Forestry Education and Training Bogor Agency,
The Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl. Prada Samlawi Rumpin, Bogor, Indonesia
 3Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Bogor Agricultural University, Academic Ring Road,
Campus IPB Dramaga, PO Box 168, Bogor, Indonesia 16680

Received Agustus 23, 2016/Accepted October 20, 2016


In the past few years, forest management unit (KPH) Bogor has experienced many problems, technical, environmental and social, affecting the company's finances. This condition requires new breakthroughs in the form of managerial options in managing the forests of KPH Bogor. At present, KPH Bogor has formulated 12 managerial options. The purpose of this study is to build a spatial model in selecting managerial options at site level. The spatial models were built based on the score of each land unit which was obtained from expert judgment using an intensity scale, while weight was obtained using a pairwise comparison, resulting in the following equation: total score = 0.14 (0.06x1 + 0.11x2 + 0.09x3 + 0.08x4 + 0.10yx5 + 0.31x6 + 0.25x7) + 0.72 (0.08y1 + 0.22y2 +  0.46y3 + 0.13y4 + 0.12y5) +0.14 (0.45z1 + 0.05z2 + 0.44z3 + 0.06z4). The resulting total score was then divided into 5 classes using the equal interval method. The results for each of the managerial options were then aggregated using GIS to create KPH Bogor's management pattern. In areas where there was an overlap due to the similarity in options, a decision support system using neighboring similarity spatial analysis was used. This step allowed the spatial model to be built with many biophysical, social, and economic variables. This spatial model could map 12 types of managerial options at site level in the production structuring in KPH Bogor.


Ananda J, Herath G. 2009. A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics 68(10):2535−2548. 2009.05.010.

Balteiro LD, Romero C. 2008. Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment. Forest Ecology and Management 255:3222–3241. 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.038.

Davis LS, Johnson KN, Bettinger PS, Howard TE. 2001. Forest Management to Suistain Ecological, Economic, and Sosial Values. Fourth Edition. Boston: The McGraw-Hill Higer Education.

Domiri DD. 2012. Model spasial kerentanan produksi beras menggunakan teknologi inderaja dan SIG (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Indramayu, Jawa Barat) [disertasi]. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural University.

Hardjowigeno H, Widiatmika. 2007. Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan dan Perencanaan Tataguna Lahan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Jaimes NBP, Sendra JB, Delgado MG, Plata RF, Némiga XA, Solís LRM. 2012. Determination of optimal zones for forest plantations in the state of Mexico using multi-criteria spatial analysis and GIS. Journal of Geographic Information System 4(3):204–218.


Jaya INS. 2012. Teknik-teknik Pemodelan Spasial dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan. Bogor: Departemen Manajemen Hutan.

Kangas J, Store R, Kangas A. 2005 Socioecological landscape planning approach and multicriteria accept-ability analysis in multiple-purpose forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 7:603– 614. 2003.12.001.

Konsorsium Revisi HCV Toolkit Indonesia. 2008. Panduan Identifikasi Kawasan Bernilai Konservasi Tinggi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Tropenbos International Indonesia Programme.

[Perhutani] Perusahaan Hutan Negara Indonesia. 2012. Pedoman Penanganan dan Penyelesaian Konflik Tenurial dalam Kawasan Hutan. Jakarta: Perhutani.

[Perhutani] Perusahaan Hutan Negara Indonesia. 2014. Rencana Jangka Panjang Perum Perhutani Tahun 2015−2019. Jakarta: Perhutani.

[Perhutani] Perusahaan Hutan Negara Indonesia. 2015. Pemetaan Tipologi Tapak dan Unit Manajemen dalam Rangka Perbaikan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Perum Perhutani. Jakarta: Perhutani.

[Pertanian] 1981. Surat Keputusan Menteri Pertanian No.680-684/Kpts/Um/1981. Jakarta:Pertanian.

Malekmohammadi B, Blouchi LR. 2014. Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using multi criteria decision making and geographic information system. Ecological Indicators 41:133–144. 16/j.ecolind.2014.01.038.

Mendoza GA, Martins H. 2006. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management. 230:1–22. reco.2006.03.023.

Mustofa SM. 2011. Perilaku Masyarakat Desa Hutan dalam Memanfaatkan Lahan Di Bawah Tegakan. Komunitas 3(1):1–11.

Nagaraju MSS, Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Srivastava R, Raja P, Barthwal AK. 2011. Soil loss mapping for sustainable development and management of land resources in Warora Tehsil of Chandrapur District of Maharashtra: An integrated approach using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 39(1):51–61.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 1999. Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 114/1999 tentang penataan ruang kawasan Bogor-Puncak-Cianjur. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2008. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 54/2008 tentang penataan ruang kawasan Jakarta, Bogor, Depok, Tangerang, Bekasi, Puncak, Cianjur. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Purwanto J, Rusolono T, Prasetyo LB. 2015. Spatial model of deforestation in Kalimantan from 2000 to 2013. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 21(3):110–118. https://doi. org/10.7226/jtfm.21.3.110.

Rusdiana O, Amalia RF. 2012. Kesesuaian lahan Pinus merkusii Jungh et de Vriese pada areal bekas tegakan Tectona grandis Linn. F. Silvikultur Tropika 3:174–181.

Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Services Sciences. 1:83–98.

Shang ZB, He HS, Xi W, Shifley SR, Palik BJ. 2012. Integrating LANDIS model and a multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate cumulative effects of forest management in the Missouri Ozarks, USA. Ecological Modelling 229:50–63. del.2011.08.014.

Seydack, A. H. W. 1995. An unconventional approach to timber yield regulation for multiaged, multispecies forest, fundamental consideration. Forest Ecology and Management Journal 77:139–153. 16/0378-1127(95)03577-W.

Song G, Chen Y, Tian M, Lv SH, Zhang SH, Liu S. 2010. The ecological Southwestern Mountain Region of China based on GIS and AHP method. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2:465–475. 2010.10.051.

Sulistiyono N, Jaya INS, Prasetyo LB, Tiryana T. 2015. Spatial model of deforestation in Sumatera Island using typological approach. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 21(3):99–109.

Guoqing Y, Haibo Y, Zhizong T, Baosen Z. 2011. Eco-environment quality assessment of Miyun County Based on RS and GIS. Procedia Environmental Sciences 10:2601 –2607. 2011.09.404.

Guiqina W, Li Q, Guoxuea L, Lijun C. 2009. Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Management 90:2414–2421. jenvman.2008.12.008.

Varma V, Ferguson I, Wild I. 2000. Decision support system for the sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 128:49–55.

Wijaya PA, Saleh MB, Tiryana T. 2015. Spatial model of deforestation in Jambi Province for the periode 1990–2011. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 21(3):128–137.

Wischmeier WH, Smith DD. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning. Agriculture Handbook No. 537. Washington DC: USDA/Science and Education Administration.

How to Cite
Hutauruk, R. R., Puspaningsih, N., & Saleh, M. B. (2016). Spatial Modeling for Determining Managerial Options for Structuring Productivity in KPH Bogor. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 22(3), 169. Retrieved from

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>