JIPI
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Respons Genotipe Kedelai sebagai Tanaman Sela pada Tumpang Sari dengan Ubi Kayu

  • Titik Sundari Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)
  • Purwantoro Purwantoro Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)
  • Rina Artari Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)
  • Yuliantoro Baliadi Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)

Abstract

Soybean development to intercropping is one of the opportunities to increase soybean planting area. Each soybean variety has different responses to intercropping so it is required to study soybean varieties that are suitable or adaptive to intercropping environments. Therefore, a research was conducted to determine the response of soybean genotypes in intercropping with cassava. The research was conducted at the Jambegede Research Station, Malang in February to December 2018, in two environments, namely intercropping (L1) and monoculture (L2), with two planting times, namely three weeks (T1) and 4 months (T2) after cassava planting. Twelve promising lines and three varieties (Dena 1, Dena 2, and Grobogan) were used as research materials. A completely randomized block design with three replications was used to arrange the treatments in each environment. The results showed that the responses of each soybean genotype tested as intercrops on intercropping system with cassava were varied, depending on the soybean planting time. GH-5 and GH-6 soybean genotypes are suitable for the first intercrop (T1), while GH-3 are suitable as the second intercrops (T2) in intercropping system with cassava + Soybean, with higher stress tolerance index (STI) and lower weighted sensitivity index (WSI) than the other genotypes tested. Based on the land equivalent ratio (LER), intercropping of cassava with GH-5, GH-6, or GH-3 soybean genotypes was advantageous (RKL>1.0).

Keywords: land equivalent ratio, stress tolerance index, weighted sensitivity index

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Titik Sundari, Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)

Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi, Jl. Raya Kendalpayak km 8, PO Box 66 Malang 65101

Purwantoro Purwantoro, Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)

Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi, Jl. Raya Kendalpayak km 8, PO Box 66 Malang 65101

Rina Artari, Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)

Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi, Jl. Raya Kendalpayak km 8, PO Box 66 Malang 65101

Yuliantoro Baliadi, Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi (Balitkabi)

Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi, Jl. Raya Kendalpayak km 8, PO Box 66 Malang 65101

References

Balitkabi. 2015. Panduan Teknis Budidaya Kedelai di Berbagai Kawasan Agroekosistem. Malang (ID): Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi.

Balitkabi. 2016. Pedoman Budidaya Ubi Kayu di Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.

Brinta I, Seran Th. 2009. Effect of paired row planting of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) inter-cropped with vegetable amaranths (Amaranths tricolor L) on yield component of radish in sandy regosol. Journal Agriculture Sciences. 4: 19-28.

Egbe OM, Alibo I, Nwueze. 2010. Evaluation of some extra-early-and early-maturing cowpea varieties for intercropping with maize in southern guinea savannah of Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. 1(5): 845-858. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2010.1.5.845.858

Esmaeili A, Sadeghpour A, Hosseini SMB, Jahanzad E, Chaichi MT, Hashemi M. 2011. Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped barley (Hordeum vulgare) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata). International Journal of Plant Production. 5(4): 395-404.

Fan Y, Chen J, Cheng Y, Ali Raza M, Wu X, Wang Z, Liu Q, Wang R, Wang X, Yong Y, Liu W, Liu J, Du J, Shu K, Yang W, Yang F. 2018. Effect of shading and light recovery on the growth, leaf structure, and photosynthetic performance of soybean in a maize-soybean relay-strip intercropping system. PLoS ONE. 13(5): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198159

Hidoto L, Loha G. 2013. Identification of suitable legumes in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)-Legumes intercropping. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8(21): 2559-2562.

Iqbal MA, Iqbal A, Maqbool Z, Ahmad Z, Ali E, Siddiqui MH, Ali S. 2018. Revamping soil quality and correlation studies for yield and yield attributes in sorghum-legumes intercropping systems. Bioscience Journal. 34: 1165-1176. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v34n3a2018-36561

Kadziuliene ZL, Sarunaite I, Dereikyte S, Maiksteniene A, Arlauskiene L, Masilionyte R, Cenuleviciene V, Zekaite. 2009. Qualitative effects of pea and spring cereals intercrop in the organic farming systems. Agronomi Research. 7(2): 606-611.

Liu W, Zou J, Zhang J, Yang F, Wan Y, Yang W. 2015. Evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) stem vining in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. Plant Production Sciences. 91: 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.18.69

Matusso JMM, Mugwe JN, Mucheru-Muna M. 2013. Effects of different maize (Zea mays L.) soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) intercropping patterns on yields and land equivalent ratio. Journal of Cereals Oilseeds. 4(4): 48-57.

Mohammed SAA. 2011. Assessing the land equivalent ratio (LER) of two leguminous pastures (CLITORIA and SIRATRO) intercropping at various cultural practices and fencing at ZALINGEI–Western Darfur State-Sudan. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology. 2(11): 1074-1080.

Pypers P, Sanginga JM, Kasereka B, Walangululuc M, Vanlauwea B. 2011. Increased productivity through integrated soil fertility management in cassava-legume intercropping systems in the highlands of Sud-Kivu, DR Congo. Field Crops Research. 120: 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.004

Qi XS, Liu ZX, Guan RX, Wang XR, Gou ZW, Chang RZ, Qiu LJ. 2012. Comparison of evaluation methods for drought resistance at soybean adult stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 38: 665-674. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00665

Rezaei-Chianeh E, Nassab ADM, Shakiba MR, Ghassemi-Golezani, Aharizad S, Shekari F. 2011. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) at different plant population densities. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6: 1786-1793.

Silva DV, Evander A, Ferreira CM, Oliveira GAM, Pereira RR, Braga JB, dos Santos I, Aspiazu, Souza FM. 2016. Productivity of cassava and other crops in an intercropping system. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria. 43(1): 159166. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202016000100015

Sundari T, Mutmaidah S. 2018. Identifikasi kesesuaian genotipe kedelai untuk tumpang sari dengan ubi kayu. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. 23(1): 29-37. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.23.1.29

Taah KJ, Buah JN, OgyiriAdu E. 2017. Evaluation of spatial arrangement of legumes on weed suppression in cassava production. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 12(1): 1-11.

Xu-Sheng QI, Liu ZX, Guan RX, Wang XR, Gou ZW, Chang RZ, Qiu LJ. 2012.Comparison of evaluation methods for drought-resistance at soybean adult stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 38: 665-674. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00665

Zhang G, Yang Z, Dong S. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and mayze intercropping system. Field Crops Research. 124: 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.006

Published
2020-01-23
How to Cite
Sundari, T., Purwantoro, P., Artari, R., & Baliadi, Y. (2020). Respons Genotipe Kedelai sebagai Tanaman Sela pada Tumpang Sari dengan Ubi Kayu. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 25(1), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.25.1.129