The Practice of Discretion in Implementing Forest-Rehabilitation Policy in Forest Management Unit

Abstract

This study analyzed the implementation of discretion in forest and land rehabilitation policy (RHL) on street-level bureaucracy (SLB). The study conducted at Forest Management Unit (KPHL) Rinjani Barat, used Michael Lipsky's conception about street-level bureaucracy and discretion in the forest management. The result shows the history and forest tenure problem become a forest management framework for SLB. Because of that, forest management from top down system has changed to participatory between SLB and communities. The result of RHL policy is sucess story, good forest management and community welfare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Adi Dzikrullah Bahri, Pusat Studi Agraria (PSA IPB), Sajogyo Institute
I am a researcher in the Center for Agrarian Studies (PSA IPB) and Sajogyo Institute, Bogor. My focus in governance and natural resourches policy.

References

Astuti, S. J. A., 2009. Parameter diskresi birokratik: Studi kasus pemerintahan Kota Surabaya dan Kabupaten Situbondo. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik 13 (1), pp. 31–50.

Barr, C., A. Dermawan, H. Purnomo, H. Komarudin, 2010. Financial Governance and Indonesia's Reforestation Fun During the Soeharto and Post-Soeharto Periods, 1989-2009: A Political Economic Analysis of Lessons for REDD+. CIFOR, Bogor.

Barr, C. M., J. A. Sayer, 2012. The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia–Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+. Biological Conservation 154, pp. 9–19.

Cifor, 1999. CIFOR Annual Report 1998. CIFOR, Bogor.

Creswell, J. W., 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc, California; London; New Delhi.

Damayanti, E. K., L. B. Prasetyo, H. Kartodihardjo, A. Purbawiyatna, 2013. Transitions to Sustainable Forest Management and Rehabilitation in the Asia Pacific Region: Indonesia Country Report. Faculty of Forestry, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor.

Denzin, N. K., Y. S. Lincoln, 1997. Handbook of Qualilative Research: Second Edition. Sage Publications, Inc, London, New Delhi.

[Dephut] Departemen Kehutanan, 2008. Statistik Kehutanan Indonesia 2008. Departemen Kehutanan, Jakarta.

Dwiyana, R., 2008. Akuntabilitas Administrasi dan Hukum Atas Keputusan Administrasi Pejabat Pemerintah. UI Press, Jakarta.

Evans, A. 2006. Discretion and street-level bureaucracy theory: A case study of local authority social work. Disertasi. University of Warwick, School of Health and Social Studies, Warwick.

Evans, T., J. Harris, 2004. Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work 34, pp. 871–895.

Irawan, P., 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Universitas Indonesia, Depok.

Kartodihardjo, H., 2006. Masalah kelembagaan dan arah kebijakan rehabilitasi hutan dan lahan. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan 3 (1), pp. 29–41.

Kartodihardjo, H., 2014. Pengarusutamaan pada peraturan dan perundang-undangan kehutanan. Dalam: Sugiharto, editor. Strategi Pengembangan KPH dan Perubahan Struktur Kehutanan Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Jakarta.

Kartodihardjo, H., A. Supriono, 2000. Dampak pembangunan sektoral terhadap konversi dan degradasi hutan alam: Kasus pembangunan HTI dan perkebunan di Indonesia. Occasional Paper, No.26 (1). CIFOR, Bogor.

Kartodihardjo, H., Hendrayanto, E. Cahyono, A. D. Bahri, 2014. Kesiapan daerah dalam pencegahan korupsi pada program penurunan emisi. Laporan Penelitian. Tranparency International Indonesia, Jakarta.

[Kemenhut] Kementerian Kehutanan, 2012. Data dan Informasi Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) Tahun 2012. Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan, Kementerian Kehutanan, Jakarta.

Klatt, M., J. Schmidt, 2012. Epistemic discretion in constitutional law. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (1), pp. 69–105.

[KLHK] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, 2016. Statistik Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Tahun 2015. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Jakarta.

Kuhn, T. S., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago, Chicago.

Lipsky, M.,1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

Permana, T. C. I., 2009. Pengujian keputusan diskresi oleh pengadilan tata usaha negara. Tesis. Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Ridwan, 2009. Diskresi (freies ermessen) oleh pejabat pemerintah rambu hukum, alat ukur keabsahan, dan kecermatan dalam penggunaannya. Jurnal Media Hukum 16 (3), pp. 439–461.

Ridwan, 2014. Diskresi dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. FH UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Warassih, E., 2005. Pranata Hukum Sebuah Telaah Sosiologis. PT. Suryandaru Utama, Semarang.

Published
2019-03-08
How to Cite
Bahri, A. D. (2019) “The Practice of Discretion in Implementing Forest-Rehabilitation Policy in Forest Management Unit”, Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, 9(1), pp. 52-60. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.9.1.52-60.